Saturday May 1, 2010 - Vol. IX Issue 5
[Download PDF for Printing]
Fires and Explosions
By John Nordin
A PEAC-tool user called AristaTek
offices recently and said that when he modeled for “gasoline”, large damage distances
(about ¾ mile) were displayed on the PEAC tool for blast 0.5 psi overpressure
distance and heat radiation to 2nd
degree burns, and it was his
experience that gasoline spills even with trailers do not result in this kind
of damage distance.
There are several menu selections in
the PEAC tool for different “what if” or “worst case” situations. The modeler
had selected a situation where the contents of a very large trailer had spilled
its contents (71,000 lbs) and the gasoline had completely vaporized in a
somewhat confined area; also the vapors did not disperse before finding an
ignition source. Another possible menu selection for the same quantity of
gasoline spilled is the situation where the gasoline did not vaporize to any
significant degree before ignition; the result is a pool fire. This is
explained in the “acknowledgment statements” when the user makes the selection,
but the PEAC tool is designed for the responder to run through a lot of “what
if” situations quickly with a minimum of reading. The PEAC tool displays “what
Nevertheless, large explosions and
fires with gasoline do occur. We will look at some examples.
Buncefield (England) Explosion and
Fire, 11 December 2005
The Wikipedia website, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buncefield_fire
, gives a good description of this
incident with links to government investigation reports.
At 6:01 AM on Sunday, 11 December
2005, a large explosion and fireball occurred at the Hertfordshire Oil and
Storage Terminal west of London in the United Kingdom. This terminal supplies
30% of the fuel for Heathrow Airport. The blast measured 2.4 on the Richter
scale according to the British Geological Survey; the noise was heard as far
away as Belgium, France, and the Netherlands. Nearby offices were damaged so
badly that almost every window was broken. The blast knocked down a warehouse
wall 0.5 miles away and blew out windows as far as 5 miles away. Some
industrial buildings were destroyed or rendered unstable. Smaller secondary
explosions were set off within the storage terminal at 6:27 and 6:28 AM, and
eventually fires engulfed 23 large storage tanks. Cars on nearby streets also caught
fire. Off-site damage estimates (from insurance claims) totaled one billion English pounds. There were 43 reported
injuries. Fortunately the accident occurred Sunday morning when the work areas
were almost vacated so there were no fatalities.
Government investigation [directed by
the Health and Safety commission, available at http://www.buncefieldinvestigation.gov.uk/reports/initialreport.pdf
], present a time line for events
just prior to the explosion. The following sketch is from the Health Safety
Executive as released to the public by BBC news:
Much of the information as to the
cause of the accident was obtained from facility site closed circuit TV footage
linked to the control room.
At 19:00 hours on
10 December, Tank 912 began receiving unleaded gasoline (petrol) at the rate of
At 05:20 hours on
11 December, calculations indicated that tank 912 should have been full at the
fill rate, and that the protection system should have automatically shut off
the supply of petrol to the tank to prevent overfilling, but the tank continued
At 05:38 hours,
TV footage show escaping fuel from the overflowing tank. The overfilling fuel
tended to splash as it overfilled at the top, fragment and vaporize as it hit a
deflector plate on the side of the tank with some liquid dropping to the ground
within the bund area surrounding the tank.
At 05:46 hours,
TV footage showed a shimmering vapor cloud about 2 meters thick flowing from
the bund area in all directions.
At 05:50 hours,
the vapor cloud continued to grow as shown by area 3 in the sketch. A delivery
person seeing the advancing cloud a few minutes later abandoned his vehicle and
ran away from the cloud.
At 06:01 hours,
just seconds before the explosion, the vapor cloud reached the area defined by
4 in the sketch.
At 06:01 hours,
an explosion and fireball occurs. The ignition source was not definitely
determined, but a bright flash was recorded by closed circuit TV in the
direction of the Fuji building an instant before the explosion (which also destroyed
the camera), at a pump house location. The fleeing delivery person was knocked
down from the force of the blast but survived.
At 06:08 hours,
an emergency services major incident was declared. Incident command and
control was set up near the site.
explosions occur at 06:27 and 06:28 hours, and 23 fuel storage tanks were
engulfed in fire.
Peak of fire at 12:00
hours. 180 firefighters, 20 support vehicles, 25 water pumps. Used 785,000
liters of foam concentrate and 68 million liters of water. Fires extinguished
on 14 December.
heat damage to off-site property, Maylands estate businesses, photo from http://www.buncefieldinvestigation.gov.uk/reports/recommendations.pdf
The amount of gasoline vaporized and
exploded in the Buncefield incident is uncertain, but one estimate was 30
tonnes, or 66,000 lbs (10% of the gasoline that overflowed from tank 912).
This was roughly the same amount (about 71,000 lbs) that the PEAC tool modeler
used in his hypothetical trailer accident, and reported damage estimates of ¾
mile for heat and blast. The key to modeling damage is, “How much gasoline
vaporizes and is available for explosion”.
The group of oil companies that owned
the Buncefield fuel storage depot believed that cold gasoline could not explode
in open air (reference: Travor Kletz, professor at Loughborough University (UK),
page 15, Chemical Processing,
December 2009), but it did. This kind of
event has not happened before, the owners thought.
Other Depot Storage and Refinery Explosions
A 2004 Swedish study, H. Persson and
A. Lönnermark, Swedish National Testing and
Research Institute Report 2004:14, available from http://www.sp.se/sv/units/fire/Documents/Skydd/SP_report2004_14.pdf
reviewed 480 worldwide tank fire
incidents at fuel storage depots and refineries during the period 1951-2003. The
emphasis of the report is on firefighting of large tank and pool fires. Several
of the gasoline explosions and fires were initiated due to tank overfilling;
the resulting gasoline vapors contacted an ignition source and exploded
resulting in a fireball, which set off tank fires. Some fires were started by
lightning. The degree of explosion and initial fireball depended upon how much
gasoline vapor was available at concentrations between the upper and lower
explosive limit; the fireball flash quickly ignited liquid fuel and fuel vapor
above the upper explosive limit concentration blurring the distinction between
a pool fire and fireball. In the interest of safety, the authors strongly
recommended that information on incidents be shared openly to minimize future
Small Gasoline Spill, Homeowner
Working on Car, 13 March 2010
A homeowner was working on his car
near his garage in Yakima, Washington and spilled some gasoline. The gasoline
vapors contacted an ignition source in his garage (apparently from a space
heater, but one account said a lighted cigarette) which ignited and exploded.
The resulting fire and explosion destroyed his garage, with flames spreading to
the back of his house. Firemen arrived quickly. Damage totaled $150,000.
Gasoline Pipeline Rupture,
Washington, 10 June 1999, 3 killed, Environmental Damage
. and http://www.iosc.org/papers/00888.pdf.
On 10 June 1999, a 16-inch gasoline
pipeline owned by the Olympic Pipe Line Company and supplying fuel to the
Seattle-Tacoma airport and other customers ruptured spilling an estimated 231,000
gallons of gasoline into Hanna and Whatcom Creeks in Bellingham, WA. The spill
occurred in wildlife/park areas killing over 100,000 salmon, trout, and other
fish. The vapors from the gasoline contacted an ignition source resulting in
an explosion and fireball which raced 1.5 miles down the creek bed killing two
boys and a young fisherman. Nine people were also injured, and 26 acres of
forest were burned. The explosion resulted in $45 million in property damage,
including blast damage to a water treatment plant and water intake vault. The
families of the victims also settled in court for $100 million in damages. The
pipeline company also paid for environmental cleanup as required by the Oil
Pollution Act of 1990. Environmental cleanup included the list at http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/spills/Special_Focus/Bellingham_Pipeline/Bellingham_Pipeline_p2.html
At left is a view along the path of
the fire along Whatcom Creek (14 June), from an EPA report, located at
Just prior to ignition, Bellingham
firefighters were investigating a report of gasoline odor in the area. The
firefighters found a shimmering vapor cloud about 10 feet above the creek. The
explosion occurred at 5:02 PM, 38 minutes after the first 911 calls reporting
gasoline odor. The ignition source was unknown, but a fireplace lighter found
near the confluence of Whatcom and Hanna Creeks and possibly used by the two
boys who were killed has been suggested. The fire lasted for less than an
hour, including both the initial “fireball” and a “pool fire” on top of the
water, but secondary fires lasted five days. Fires extended for two miles
along the creek.
Responders established a Unified
Command which include the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, state
agencies, the local Bellingham Fire Department, the principal responsible
party (pipeline company), and Lummi tribal representation. Other agencies
Our review based on available
information obtained from Internet websites is that the “explosion” was
probably limited to near the pipeline break and the water intake vault near the
water treatment plant, and most of the creek underwent a deflagration (a rapid
advancing flame front). The two boys, who were found still alive, died of burn
injuries. The fisherman’s death was due to drowning.
Gasoline Barge Explosion and Fire, 21
February 2003, at Port Terminal on Staten Island
At 10:10 AM on 21 February 2003, a
gasoline barge delivering gasoline at the ExxonMobil dock on Staten Island’s
western shore exploded killing two people on the barge and badly burning a dockside
depot worker. Witnesses told of metal chunks flying in the air and of searing
heat and blast forces that knocked people down, and shattered windows miles
away from the explosion, according to accounts in the New York Times. Harbor
surveillance video taken by the Coast Guard captured the 5-second blast footage
which was shown on local television. After the blast, the gasoline which
remained in the barge or spilled into the Arthur Kill waterway continued to
burn as a pool fire. The barge quickly sunk.
Initially, city officials and also
firefighters who rushed to the scene thought “terrorism”, but by early
afternoon Mayor Bloomberg told reporters that there was no reason to think that
this is nothing more than a tragic accident. The 118,000 barrel capacity, 340-foot
long barge was carrying 100,000 barrels and was halfway unloaded (50,000
barrels still left in the barge) when the blast occurred. The burned dockside
worker who was hospitalized in critical condition said that he heard a
“grinding noise” apparently coming from the barge diesel engine powering the gasoline
transfer pump which had been “repaired” the day before unloading began.
Investigators focused on the pump as an ignition source for the explosion. A
single cargo transfer hose was being used to transfer gasoline from the barge
to a single on-shore tank. As gasoline was pumped from the barge, air was
pulled into the barge compartment space.
A typical large fuel barge, from
Normally, the vapor space in any
barge or other gasoline carrier including an automobile fuel tank would be too
rich to result in a vapor cloud explosion. But if the vapor concentration in
the barge was between the lower explosive limit and upper explosion limit mixed
with air in the barge vapor space, a vapor cloud explosion will occur upon
ignition. Assuming that the total vapor space contains gasoline vapor at an
upper explosive limit of 7.6%, we calculated roughly 5000 lbs of gasoline vapor
contributing to the explosion. If the PEAC tool model is run for gasoline,
5000 lbs of exploding gasoline vapor (in a confined space) results in a 1613
foot damage distance for 0.5 psi overpressure, or 15223 feet for 0.1 psi
overpressure. Glass under stress can shatter at 0.1 psi overpressure, which is
consistent with the observation that window breakage was reported several miles
NOAA aerial photo of area taken about
3:30 PM, from http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories/s1101.htm.
Firefighters concentrated their
efforts on protecting a nearby fuel barge and on the depot tank farm, letting
fire from the burning barge and gasoline spilled in the water burn itself
out. A New York City Firefighters account on protecting a nearby fuel barge
is published at http://marine1fdny.com/port_mobile.php. Quick response by firefighters prevented a chain
reaction from igniting any of the on-shore petroleum storage tanks or a
possible explosion from the nearby barge being unloaded which still contained
344,000 gallons of gasoline.
According to the Coast Guard
investigating the accident, divers surveying the wreckage of the sunken barge
the next day reported that the blast created a tunneling effect in the barge with
the upper deck folded over. All 12 compartment tanks of the barge were
destroyed by the explosion.
Cargo Trailer Accidents
Gasoline cargo trailers delivering
fuel to filling stations typically have a capacity for carrying 7000 to 9000
gallons of gasoline and are divided into several compartments.
National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB)
reports (see http://www.ntsb.gov/Publictn/publictn.htm
) were reviewed for gasoline spills
involving tractor cargo trailers. The National Transportation Board issues a
report for only a few accidents; in many situations the spilled gasoline is
cleaned up without any fire or explosion. Sometimes there is a small explosion
and fire involving spilled gasoline, but the cargo trailer remains intact.
Sometimes the cargo trailer ruptures and is engulfed in fire. We did not find
any NSTB report where the cargo trailer released all or most of its contents as
vapor which exploded, or any report where an intact cargo trailer was engulfed
in flames resulting in a BLEVE-type explosion. There was a vapor cloud
release under essentially zero wind conditions from a gasoline cargo trailer accident
near Houston, TX, in the 1960’s, which resulted in a fireball and explosion,
but we were unable to find details (no report located on the Internet, nothing
on the amount of gasoline in the vapor cloud).
A typical report was NTSB Number
HAR-98.02, accessed from the NTSB website, which involved a collision of a
truck tractor pulling a cargo tank containing gasoline with a sedan under an
overpass on the New York State thruway, at 12:10 AM on 9 October 1997. The
ensuing fire destroyed both vehicles and the overpass, closing the throughway
for six months. The driver of the sedan was killed. Property damage was
estimated at $7 million.
Train Car BLEVE explosion: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xf3WKTwHpIU
BLEVE is an acronym for “Boiling
Liquid Expanding Vapor Explosion”.
What Does This Mean To the PEAC Tool
Real-world gasoline spills or other
flammable liquid spills can take place under many different circumstances.
Under an emergency situation, a responder cannot be burdened with a complex
interface menu. He/she needs answers quickly. The PEAC tool allows either two
choices, either a spilled liquid pool which catches fire or the flammable
liquid vaporizes resulting in a vapor cloud explosion and fireball. Both
circumstances require an ignition source (an electric motor, a vehicle, cell
phone, static electricity, etc.). The truth is that ignition of a typical
gasoline spill results in both a vapor cloud explosion, a short-duration flash
fire (“fire ball”), and a longer duration pool fire. The responder would need
to know how much gasoline had vaporized and was between the upper and lower
explosive limit to do a fireball and blast damage calculation. The PEAC tool
chose to represent both situations. The responder can run the PEAC tool using
say a 5% vapor cloud release to obtain a possible explosion or fireball damage
estimate and also run the pool fire model to see what can potentially happen,
or run the model with all of the gasoline vaporized.
An experienced firefighter will be
alert to potential hazardous circumstances that can result in a vapor cloud
explosions. Especially hazardous circumstances include (1) vapor filling a
confined or partially confined space such as a building interior, corridor, or
drainage ditch;(2) even an unconfined outdoor situation where gasoline vapors
accumulate, e.g. odor, a “shimmering” vapor cloud; or (3) a gasoline tank or
other flammable liquid storage tank engulfed in fire. The explosion and heat damage
distances can be great. And as the Bellingham Washington gasoline pipeline rupture
example showed, the damage distance is not necessarily circular. Experience
and training is important in developing a sense of what can potentially happen.
An Analysis of a
Vapor Cloud Explosion, 22 November 2006, Danvers Massachusetts, May 2007 PEAC
Explosions and Fires, June 2006, PEAC Newsletter.